Australian Federal Court Sides with ASIC Against Broker Gallop

The (ASIC) announced this Thursday that the Federal Court of Australia has delivered judgement in the regulator’s favour in proceedings against (GIG), which is in liquidation, Gallop Asset Management Pty Ltd (GAM), Stumac Pty Ltd and former director Mr Ming-Chien Wang.
GIG and GAM jointly operated the Gallop business and each held an . The company provided trading services for a range of financial products including foreign exchange (forex), precious metals, derivatives and contracts for differences (CFDs).

Currently, the court has proposed the following orders: declarations of contraventions of financial services laws by GIG, declarations that Wang was knowingly concerned in the contraventions of GIG, permanent injunctions restraining Wang from carrying on a financial services business, an order disqualifying Wang from managing a corporation for 10 years, an order that Wang pay a civil penalty of $3 million, and the winding up of GAM and Stumac.
Justice Charlesworth has given the defendants time to apply to the Court about the proposed orders. If there is no application, then the Court will make the proposed orders on the 26th of September 2019.
According to the statement from the Aussie regulator, the proposed civil penalty against Wang will be the highest civil penalty in an ASIC proceeding awarded against an individual.
Background on ASIC vs Gallop
Previously, ASIC had already obtained interim junctions against the companies and Wang, which allowed the regulator to effectively close down the Gallop business. The watchdog also received junctions to freeze orders over Australian bank accounts.
The proceedings follow on from clients of Gallop, which were predominately residents of mainland China and Taiwan, complaining to the authority that the company was withholding their investment funds and in some cases earnings from investments.
ASIC found that between May 2016 and May 2017, more than AU$36 million was deposited into GIG’s Australian bank account. Most of this money came from investors. During this period, the majority of the money was withdrawn and transferred to overseas bank accounts which were held by entities related to GIG or otherwise having connections with Wang.
GIG was operating without an AFS licence
The Federal Court of Australia found that GIG was operating a financial services business without holding the appropriate licence. The Justice also found that the company made false and misleading statements and engaged in deceptive conduct.
“Charlesworth J also found that Mr Wang, being the controlling mind and architect of the scheme, was knowingly concerned in GIG’s contraventions., and that GIG was in the process of transitioning its business to Stumac,” the statement from ASIC said.
Charlesworth J also found that: “a large number of investors have lost the whole of their capital invested and that they have been unsuccessful in obtaining a satisfactory explanation from GIG as to those losses”, that “It is more likely than not that the funds were misapplied, so explaining the magnitude of the losses”, and that Wang “demonstrates the utmost disregard for Australia’s financial services laws.”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *