FCA Clarifies Crypto Guidelines with New Consultation Paper

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) on Wednesday released a consultation paper on cryptocurrencies to clarify its regulatory scope on the industry.
Dubbed “Guidance on Crypto” the consultation paper is an this year. The new paper was prepared after receiving a total of 92 responses from the industry.

According to the paper, it “aims to give market participants and interested stakeholders clarity on the types of crypto assets that fall within the FCA’s regulatory remit and the resulting obligations on firms and regulatory protections for consumers.”
Clarifying regulatory stance on crypto
The paper mainly focused on the unregulated tokens, regulated tokens, and market observations and clarified the industry players’ doubts on the agency’s role in the area.
“The crypto asset market and its underlying distributed ledger technology (DLT) is developing quickly, so participants need to be clear on where they are conducting activities that fall within the scope of our regulatory remit and for which they require our authorization,” the paper stated.
The and permissions the crypto-related companies to deal with to operate within the regulatory frameworks.
It further highlights the consultations on how crypto asset market participants may be affected by the transposition of the EU Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5AMLD).
Commenting on the published guidelines, Christopher Woolard, executive director of strategy and competition at the FCA, said: “This is a small, complex and evolving market covering a broad range of activities. Today’s guidance will help clarify which crypto asset activities fall inside our regulatory perimeter.”
The paper also clarified the taxonomy of crypto assets to help market participants better understand whether the tokens are regulated or they fall outside the financial watchdog’s purview.
Earlier this month, the FCA proposed a plan to and exchange-traded notes (ETNs) to retail customers, citing these investment instruments were “ill-suited” for retail investors who cannot access the value and risks associated with them.